sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Energy Collective's Eleanor Briggs looks at what El Niño reveals about our struggling energy sector

Public Policy / opinion
Energy Collective's Eleanor Briggs looks at what El Niño reveals about our struggling energy sector
Roxburgh Dam, in Otago New Zealand
Roxburgh Dam, in Otago New Zealand

By Eleanor Briggs*

When El Niño was officially declared in New Zealand, my first reaction wasn't concern – it was excitement.

That might sound strange.

El Niño usually arrives with warnings of droughts and extremely dry conditions. But for New Zealand's electricity system, it could actually be good news.

That's because what matters for our hydro system isn't how much rain falls across the country – it's where it falls. El Niño often brings more rain to the west coast of the South Island, home to many of the catchments that feed our hydro lakes.

More water in those lakes doesn't guarantee lower prices. But in a market where electricity prices are set every 30 minutes, good hydro conditions generally ease pressure on wholesale prices.

This should be something worth celebrating. Instead, it highlights a frustrating reality: a single weather event can still have a major influence on our electricity system, and when nature does deliver us a surplus of renewable energy, we're not set up to fully capture and share the benefits.

Around 60% of New Zealand's electricity comes from hydro generation, which means our fortunes are still closely tied to the weather.

Our hydro lakes act like giant batteries, storing water that can later be turned into electricity – but they can only hold so much. We can't save years' worth of rainfall for a dry season down the track, and when it rains, much of that water needs to be used relatively quickly or the opportunity is lost.

Without enough diversification into wind, solar, geothermal and other forms of storage, we remain structurally exposed to whatever the sky happens to be doing.

Retail pricing creates a second challenge. Electricity plans are typically set well in advance to protect consumers from sudden price spikes, meaning wholesale market movements don't immediately flow through to households.

This is sensible from a consumer protection perspective, but it also means periods of favourable conditions don't necessarily translate into immediate or obvious benefits for customers.

A country with our renewable resources shouldn't still feel constrained by the weather. We have the potential for so much more abundance, but our system isn't yet delivering it.

As New Zealand electrifies more of its economy, secure and competitively priced electricity will become even more important. That means we need more than just good rainfall. We need more generation, more diversity and more resilience.

The way our electricity market is currently structured warrants scrutiny. A handful of gentailers dominate the sector, and there is an ongoing debate about whether this model is sufficiently aligned with delivering the scale of new generation New Zealand needs.

And the cost of that constraint extends far beyond our power bills. Overseas analysts have already identified New Zealand as an attractive destination for energy-intensive industries like data centres because of our renewable resource base.

On paper, we should be a natural fit: abundant wind, geothermal and solar resources, combined with an increasingly renewable electricity system.

But that promise runs into the same problem. We have the resources, yet we haven't built the system to fully unlock them. The fact that New Zealand isn't seeing a wave of investment in these industries suggests the constraint isn't our natural advantage – it's our ability to turn that advantage into abundant, affordable and reliable electricity.

Recognising the opportunity isn't enough. Unless we can unlock new generation and build a system that supports growth, New Zealand risks watching those investments – and the jobs and economic activity that come with them – go elsewhere.

A wet year should be unambiguously good news. The fact that a favourable weather pattern still feels significant for electricity prices and supply is a reminder that New Zealand's challenge isn't a lack of renewable resources.

It's building an electricity system capable of turning those resources into the abundance of electricity that a country like New Zealand should be able to deliver.


*Eleanor Briggs is Chief Commercial Officer at Electric Kiwi, which is owned by the Energy Collective.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

"Under this market, the way to make a profit is to keep the system on the edge of a shortage[4]. This guarantees problems in a dry year.

What we need is a nationally coordinated market with the prime objective of providing a reliable and economic supply based on long-term contracts with generators. New generation would be secured on the basis of international competitive tenders for long-term generation that will deliver power when it’s needed, not just when the wind happens to blow and/or the sun shines. Under this market, wind and solar would have to compete on genuinely equal terms, because the system coordinator would factor in their true cost by including the cost of the backup capacity and extra transmission they require, rather than passing this cost on to all consumers[5]."

https://www.nzcpr.com/a-solution-to-our-electricity-problems/

Up
1

I love this sorta guy. Used to be a lot more of them. An engineer who remembers when they were in charge. Got handed blank cheques, got to blame someone else every time we ended up in a conservation campaign. Golden age for them. Then the bean counters came in and ended the party.

Anyway, there is nothing stopping an international competitor from coming and building here. They can sell their hypothetical base load under a PPA or on the base load futures market to whoever wants it. Nobody is stopping em.

Up
4

That Profile would channel Leland, is entirely logical. 

Remember Leland et al lost in court, re CC? Doesn't stop the touting, though. Dogs - fleas. 

'Without enough diversification into wind, solar, geothermal and other forms of storage' - wind and solar ain't storage, just sayin. No mention of the capacitance in snowmelt, either. 

Some big-picture thinking needed - and blatantly lacking. 

Up
3

Hah, no I hadn’t read about that. 

 

Some guys just really really want it to be the 80s again. 

Up
3

That guy seems to be a bit behind the times, 

Although “demand-side management” a.k.a. forced reductions in demand, is much talked about. But here was no sign of it during these high peak demands. 

On the other hand transpower report:

Difference bids ranged from 63 MW to 161 MW over the peak period, while generators, distributors, and industrial customers also reduced demand or increased on-site generation in response to system conditions.

https://static.transpower.co.nz/public/bulk-upload/documents/Market%20O…

Rooftop solar is worse than solar farms: roughly three times the cost. This is because of the smaller size and installation costs. Policies for boosting plug-in solar power show that the politicians promoting it are badly advised and motivated by futile virtue signalling. 

Right so 40% of aussie households and an increasing number of kiwi ones are installing solar to "virtue signal" it couldn't possibly be for the financial savings?

Up
1

Great response. 

I've just installed rooftop solar, generating one week today. 

I've been thinking about the question of payback. 

Typically I've seen that calculated as the residual credit from sales back to the grid each year.

But i think it's more complex than that. There is the potential increase in asset value for  my property. It is now a net exporter of electricity which gives monthly cash flow benefit. Because i have also installed a battery, i have power disruption resilience (my pumps will function  - water at the kitchen sink, hot shower, toilet cistern refill, freezer not defrost, charge my phev car, etc). There is a value to that. 

Then, when it comes time to sell my home, arguably it has a desirable point of difference that will result in either or both, higher selling price and a comparative time reduction between listing and sale.  Again a value attaches to that.

Up
4

And it isn't just the price of electricity now, but in 10 or 20 years time. If current electricity price inflation keeps occurring then its an absolute no brainer. 

Up
1

It is sometimes quite a good investment, especially as it probably doesn't have much volatility in short term returns. But it's not a slam dunk for most households I think. And for a system that has competitive returns (ie no batteries), there is no resilience benefit.

Global stock returns (nominal) for the last 100 years have been around 8-9%, so the opportunity cost is meaningful.

There are some risks. Ie, buy back rates could tank as grid scale solar really picks up, there's a 1000MW under construction today. And the obvious stuff like the neighbours might build a 3 story townhouse, plant a fast growing tree. Equipment might fail out of warranty.

If you need to use a lot of power during the day, and have no ability to move that consumption to cheap night rates, then it can have very solid returns. That is not the case for most households.

Up
1

If the performance of the UK, Germany, Australia electricity costs in the past 30 years is any indication then it is a brainer. System costs go through the roof with the addition of feel good intermittent supply. Having ones house on solar some of the time and no industry left.

"The most simplistic argument is to point out that the marginal costs of wind and solar are close to zero. This is indeed the case, and in many respects it is uninteresting. Comparing the marginal cost of gas with wind and solar is comparing apples with oranges. ...To be clear, renewables don’t pay the costs of the intermittency they cause to the system; they don’t pay for the additional capacity needed to meet an expected peak demand; they don’t pay for the extra transmission and distribution networks required; and there need to be lots of wind turbines and lots of solar panels to replicate the power output (when the wind is blowing and the sun shining) of a gas turbine."

https://dieterhelm.co.uk/energy-climate/the-price-of-energy-and-the-system-costs-of-renewables/

"Throughout the 1980s, '90s, and most of the 2000s, electricity prices tracked fairly closely to general consumer price trends.

In the past decade, however, electricity has shot off the charts. Since 2008 power prices have risen 117 per cent, more than four times the average price increase across sectors."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-18/electricity-price-rises-chart-of-the-day/9985300

 

Up
0

The Aussies know how you screw the scrum in the right direction

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/australia-home-batteries

Up
1