sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

‘If we’re having to compromise on everything and just be there for the votes, that’s not something we would agree to’: Opportunity leader Qiulae Wong talks policies, what it would mean to get into Parliament and coalition dealbreakers

Public Policy / news
‘If we’re having to compromise on everything and just be there for the votes, that’s not something we would agree to’: Opportunity leader Qiulae Wong talks policies, what it would mean to get into Parliament and coalition dealbreakers

By Mandy Te and Anna Whyte

Opportunity Party leader Qiulae Wong says if elected into Parliament, she wants to be part of a Government where her party can further their objectives and policies.

“If that’s not going to be the case, if we’re having to … compromise on everything and just be there for the votes, that’s not something we would agree to,” Wong told interest.co.nz in a sit-down interview on Wednesday. “We’d rather be on the crossbenches or potentially in Opposition if that's the case.”

Her comments follow recent political opinion polling showing Opportunity has increased its support, nearing the 5% Parliamentary threshold line in the June 1News Verian Poll (4.6%), the July RNZ Reid Research (4.7%) and the recent Talbot Mills Poll (4.7%).

The latest modelling in the NZ Herald-Motu Research Poll of Polls, released on Wednesday, showed an average predicted party vote of 5.3% for Opportunity, while the July Taxpayer's Union-Curia Poll had the party sitting on 3.3%.

“We need to be really clear on what our values are in that first term, and that we’re going to deliver something of value to Parliament so that we get to stay in 2029," Wong said.

It was also important to consider what other minor parties were putting on the table.

“It’s probably not going to be a two-party coalition. If there are things there that are really contrary to what we believe so things like the Gender Definitions Bill, which we don't believe is a good piece of legislation, the Treaty Principles Bill, for the same reason, we wouldn't agree to that,” Wong said.

“And so we'll either have to go into a confidence and supply arrangement or walk away completely.”

Opportunity can work ‘constructively’ with National

Earlier in the week, Prime Minister and National Party leader Christopher Luxon ruled out working with the Opportunity Party, saying “when you want to spend more, tax more, borrow more - we ain’t doing business with you.”

Labour leader Chris Hipkins hasn’t ruled them out but he hasn’t ruled them in either, telling reporters: "It's an absolute reality that no party under MMP who hasn't already been represented in Parliament has crossed the 5% threshold, so there's always a first for everything, but it's still pretty unlikely they're going to achieve it."

Asked about Luxon’s comments, Wong said she thought it was premature of National to rule Opportunity out.

“It’s just indicative of old school politics trying to paint people in a left or right box when actually it’s more complex than that, and we need to work together on some of these solutions.”

“There is actually a lot that we agree with them on and I think we can work constructively,” she said.

Asked how the three policies Opportunity had released fit into a right-leaning Government, Wong said she thought there was a bit of misunderstanding around their tax policy.

“That tax policy, if enacted in full, would result in a tax cut for 70% of New Zealanders and that’s something that National campaigned on last election.”

“So our objective with the tax policy is to broaden the tax base, make our economy more resilient, help people take home more of their hard-earned pay from work by shifting some of the burden onto property,” Wong said.

Opportunity Party leader Qiulae Wong. Image source: Mandy Te

“For lots of people, that will just be a tax switch, so they’ll pay a bit more in their land tax, but they’ll also receive more from their income tax through the citizens’ income.”

“So I think if we can sit down and actually have a proper conversation around what we’re trying to achieve, we’re not naive to think that we can do this overnight and that we’re going to come into Parliament for a first term and do tax reform straight away.”

Wong said resistance around new ideas was one of the things that held New Zealand back and we needed to get beyond it.

Asked what policies of theirs she thought National would find attractive, Wong pointed to the party’s innovation policy, which had lots in it about growing the economy, creating higher wage jobs and tackling competition to bring prices down for everyday New Zealanders.

Who is the Opportunity Party’s voter base?

Wong said anecdotally, Opportunity had heard their voters were across the political spectrum.

There were a lot of former National voters that were frustrated at the lack of progress on environmental issues this term, and a lot of former Green Party supporters; “that were perhaps more of the James Shaw ilk that feel they don’t really align with that party anymore,” she said.

“It was interesting to see the recent Talbot Mills poll because that dug a bit deeper into where our voters are coming from, so it's not just anecdotal. There was some data there, and that validated that I think the largest portion was actually from National, and then obviously our former supporters, and then Labour was the next one.”

Asked about Gareth Morgan, who founded the party and was its first leader, Wong said she had never met him.

“He doesn’t fund [the party]. He’s not involved in any way. It’s only been recently that he started to write some commentary,” she said.

In a recent piece for Newsroom, Morgan wrote: “For both its short and medium term future, I would say it [the Opportunity Party] must stay on the crossbenches, undertake to give the ruling government its confidence vote for the duration, and be free to promote and vote on legislation on its merit.”

Asked what she thought about his commentary, Wong said what he had written was fair and could be a really good outcome for Opportunity.

“We're keeping all of those options on the table when it comes to negotiations. I think the flip side of that is that some of our voters would love to see us in a coalition government because we probably have more chance at getting some of our ideas across the line rather than necessarily just supporting the legislation of other parties.

“So there's pros and cons to each, and we'll have to just see what the major party in particular is willing to give us, and where they want to take the direction of the country.”

Qiulae Wong is the leader of the Opportunity Party. Image source: Mandy Te

‘Some big meaty things we can achieve’

Wong said Opportunity would put out some clear bottom lines closer to the election, primarily to provide voters transparency on what the party would take into those negotiations.

“I think there are some big meaty things that we can still achieve.”

An area that comes to mind is energy. “Labour and National recognise that energy sovereignty and affordability is really important, but we might be able to push them a little bit further on some of those policies.”

“If we can achieve a couple of really decent things in those first three years, that will be a huge achievement for us.”

Deep dive into Opportunity’s policies

Asked about the party and its health policy and plans for training, hiring graduates and funding the health sector, Wong said Opportunity would have a full health policy coming out in the next month or so.

“Where we come at these big issues from is always: how do we tackle the systemic problems? So we have a big focus on prevention. What are the big public health initiatives that mean we will have a healthier population that’s putting less pressure on our entire health system? And then, how do we fund primary care better so that our hospitals are not overloaded?”

Wong said the party's focus was on prevention, primary care and making sure that those funding models adequately support resourcing for those different communities.

“The workforce is a big issue as well. There's never enough money for health, and I think that's why having a good, productive, innovative economy is also a critical part of the puzzle. Because if we're not growing our economy, we're going to have to make harder and harder trade-off decisions around hospitals versus schools versus superannuation.”

Asked about superannuation and if Opportunity wanted to raise the retirement age, Wong said raising the age was challenging for those that work in manual jobs or people who have shorter life expectancies.

“If that can be managed with raising the age, then that’s a possibility.”

Wong said the party wanted to see New Zealand move towards compulsory KiwiSaver.

Opportunity's 'smart on crime' policy states it wants to "raise the age of the youth court jurisdiction, in line with developmental science."

Initially, the party had this age set at 25 but Wong said they were looking at that evidence again. They hadn’t put out an updated version of that policy yet but she said they expected the age to be lower.

Getting into Parliament in any shape is better than not being there

Wong said getting into Parliament in any shape or form was better than not.

“We would rather be in Opposition than not be there at all. I think it gives us the might of the parliamentary service to support us to work towards getting elected into Government in a future term. It gives us an opportunity to have more say in the public arena and shape the conversation and the narrative which is in the media."

“There’s huge gains to be had even in Opposition. It’s not our first choice but we’ll certainly take that over working from the outside and relying completely on volunteers and donations to keep the party going.”

‘I don’t think I’ve ever worked this hard in my life but it’s extremely rewarding’

Asked how her upbringing and heritage influenced has her politics today, Wong said she comes from a multicultural background. “I’m half Chinese and half Pākehā European … My Chinese family grew up in Fiji so we sort of have this Pasifika connection as well.”

She has always been surrounded by lots of different people from different walks of life.

“I think that has shaped my view that different perspectives are really valuable, and that coming at a particular problem from one perspective all the time is not a useful approach. And I’ve seen that in my business career as well. That the more diversity that you have of people within an organisation, the better decisions you make.”

“I think it’s a real shame that in politics we have this view that if you have one team with one ideology in power, then they’ve got to have all the answers to everything. I just don’t think that’s the case.”

As for her personal voting habits, she said she has voted across the political spectrum.

While the leadership role for Opportunity was advertised on Seek, Wong heard about the role because she was on the party’s mailing list.

She was working at KPMG at the time, doing sustainability and climate consulting, and said she was frustrated at the change in direction the government had taken around climate legislation and what that meant for the business community.

“I certainly was thinking a bit about where else I could have an impact … whether that meant going into politics, whether that was local government or doing something like this. So it was good timing, I think [when] that role came up.”

Asked how she’s been finding politics, Wong said she’s been enjoying it.

“I know it’s pretty intense and I don’t think I’ve ever worked this hard in my life but it’s extremely rewarding.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

27 Comments

Thank you for posing the question...i will keep an eye out for the policy release.

Up
3

I find it surprising that she would be willing to work with the National party, even after Luxon ruled it out. For that reason, they won't be getting my vote.

Up
2

More so as they wouldn't benefit your property investments if LVT was enacted??

She shows maturity and resolve for being fully transparent. If you were a 5% party, you'd need to work with whomever gets the majority vote in order to get any possibility of getting any of your policies enacted. This is logic, not some loyalty programme, and to say you wouldn't vote TOP due to being willing to do what it takes to get policy enacted, seems a little surface-level in your assessment. 

Up
10

Its perfectly fair to say you wont vote for a party that can go either way. You effectively lose your ability to influence whether the country goes left or right. 

That's why the green party are a left wing party, because many people wouldn't vote for environment alone. By being left they can pick up left wing voters who also care about environment. If they sat on the fence those voters may say "well I care about the environment, but voting left is more important to me"

Up
1

I'm voting greens, and have done so for quite some time. Their policies will not be helpful for a property investor like myself. I can't stand National, and their sad excuse for a leader. Supporting any party that says they'd be keen to go in to coalition with Luxon, is an absolute disgrace. Their policies are well left of centre, yet they say they could go with a right leaning party? This is most alarming IMO. 

Up
0

Supporting any party that says they'd be keen to go in to coalition with Luxon, is an absolute disgrace.

Your emotion seems to rule your judgement, common with many i know with similar views in Wellington also. However I respect everyones' right to vote for whom they wish based on their own assessments and values.

I appreciate the wealth tax of Greens seems positive from the outside, and they have made a good efforts on tax reform in their policy, however personally, in practice I don't feel that their wealth tax would capture the required revenue to offset their tax policy in a way that TOP's LVT would.

People can obscure their wealth in many ways to avoid a wealth tax, and the most wealthy often are the best at it, however they cannot obscure land, and would need to front up with the LVT regardless of their tax residency status (e.g if based overseas) which again, a wealth tax would likely not fully capture. 

Up
1

From one boomer to another, get over it, it’s an MMP world now.   I take it you are happy for the Nats to be in bed with (hold your nose) Winnie?  

Up
3

Would Winnie get as many votes if he hadn't ruled out Labour?

Up
0

I understood that he ruled out Hipkins not Labour?

Up
1

That logic reminds me of the witch trials.

If you don't drown, you're a witch.

If you do drown, you're not a witch, and you're absolved 

Up
0

hamishk,

That logic escapes me. The OP should be willing to work 'constructively' with any party putting forward policies with which they can agree, while rejecting those on which they cannot agree. That's called being an adult.

Up
0

TOP get 6 or 7% and LVTs get enacted.  I am rather partial to bit of Quail.

NZ Property slumps untill after 2030 and NZs biggest ever housing crash, finishes its great work, ending down a nominal 35% and real 70%.

Hoarding housing gets drummed out of NZs national investment mindset, for a over a generation. Investments into productive business finally boom!

Specuvesters in housing, now need to work hard labour jobs, into their 70s.......hahahaha.

The mounting toxic property "investment" loans, cause the local banks to take massive hits on their balance sheets. Oh dear!

The future is clear,  the Gecko sees it with clarity, as per every crashing NZ property market statement, comming true, since 2021.

The future is bright and cheery!!

Up
3

You forgot:

- No one builds a house because it doesn't stack up financially with existing houses much cheaper

- TOP brings in left wing parties that ramp up immigration

- Homelessness and crime up significantly

- NZ wealth down significantly

Up
1

- NZ wealth down significantly

As in NZ property prices down. 

Up
2

This is the magic of LVT, the value is drawn from the value of the land alone, not the buildings. Land is what decreases in market value. The value added by the building remains, the value of building new buildings remains. Most likely we would see construction activity increase, especially if it was a tax swap and wage earners has more money to spend on the buildings.

Up
1

Got my vote. Business, that employs people and pays tax, and commercial property back in favour, housing cheaper for all. 

Debt bases house stacking the screws everyone but banks and specugamblers, and is the greatest engine of inflation out of favour with targeted tax.

Whats not to like...?

Up
2

Are they going to have a 'smart on voting' policy and shift the voting age to 25 also? 

Up
2

I had a look at TOPs LVT  policy. "$1.7 trillion nationally, the LVT generates approximately $24 billion annually" I don't trust their numbers on LVT. I need to know who crunched the numbers and their source data. Oh yes and Maori communally owned land exempt.

The power behind the throne. Lees Galloway ex Labour Minister, James Shaw ex-Green MP, and a person associated with Chris Hipkins and probably other Labour/Green persons, past and present.

Up
0

Oh yes and Maori communally owned land exempt.

Why cherry pick this particular exemption?

Up
0

He Puapua activists are TOP leading MP candidates.

 

 

Up
0

Mass ownership of generally unused land. Who could/would pay.  10c from 100 owners is futile. 

Up
0

Would add does it seem that Qiulae Wong performs better than Luxon infront of camera and to questioning...?

Up
2

Interest is very selective on which photos/video it puts with it's preferred/unpreferred politicians. We won't get any extreme close up, looking left/right, open mouth, non-smiling etc. photos of Qiulae on this broadsheet. For Qiulae, the whole MSM machine is behind her.  

Up
0

TBH I don't see a conspiracy here. She's photogenic, that's just how it is. And she often smiles naturally, or her face at rest looks nice. Lucky her.

Luxo either looks like he's fake smiling or his orb is kinda red and shiny looking. Often has crow's feet that makes him look stressed (which he probably is)

Spoken from someone who unfortunately looks more like Luxo than Q, but you've gotta play with the cards you're dealt 

Up
3

It is more just petty than a conspiracy. In the age of the internet the paid up dripping wet left wing journo's can't find a decent photo?!

 

Up
1

Starting to lose control

Up
0

I suspect it'll turn out to be a large number, quite likely a few billion. Why not come out with and reveal the area land value for it. That's why I want to see the numbers. It'll show the if they considered the Maori communal land value at all. 

Up
0