sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Labour pledges debt reduction, return to surplus and an independent Parliamentary Budget Office to analyse government finances and election commitments

Economy / news
Labour pledges debt reduction, return to surplus and an independent Parliamentary Budget Office to analyse government finances and election commitments
[updated]
Barbara Edmonds and Chris Hipkins
Barbara Edmonds and Chris Hipkins

Labour has confirmed that, if reelected to government, it will restore the Reserve Bank's monetary policy dual mandate targeting both inflation and maximum sustainable employment.

“Growth means nothing if Kiwis don't feel it in their pay packet, their household budget, or in their future. Our fiscal strategy is about making sure they do,” Labour leader Chris Hipkins announced on Sunday.

Labour is also pledging to;  Balance the books and return to surplus. Return to original measure of OBEGAL, achieve surplus by 2029/30 and maintain a sustainable fiscal position over the forecast period. 

Operating Balance Before Gains and Losses (OBEGAL) is a key fiscal indicator used by the Government. Finance Minister Nicola Willis introduced OBEGALx, which excludes the Accident Compensation Corporation.

Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds is promising to establish an independent Parliamentary Budget office to analyse government finances and election commitments.

"First, we'll return the books to surplus by 2029/30. We'll use the conventional OBEGAL measure, not a convenient alternative for creative accounting. Second, we'll bring net [government] debt down over time, our long-term objective is 20% of GDP. And third, we will keep spending and revenue sustainable" she said. 

"Both will sit at around 33% of GDP once our capital gains tax is fully implemented. But we won't balance the books by shrinking the economy. National has tried it, and it hasn't worked."

Currently, the Reserve Bank has a single monetary policy mandate to maintain inflation between 1% and 3% - it specifically targets 2%.

The Labour-NZ First government implemented a dual mandate in 2018, when then-Finance Minister Grant Robertson added supporting maximum sustainable employment. The current Coalition Government removed the employment mandate in 2023.    

NZ First leader Winston Peters also favours returning employment to the Reserve Bank's monetary policy mandate. 

"Under National unemployment is at an 11-year high, business liquidations are up 71%, homelessness and KiwiSaver hardship withdrawals are at record levels, and public services are under pressure. That isn’t economic success," said Edmonds.

"Strong public services are an investment in New Zealand’s future. Labour will make every dollar count, invest where it matters and back the people and businesses that can grow our economy."

National finance spokesperson Nicola Willis said Labour's proposal "amounts to nothing more than spending more, borrowing more and taxing more – the same approach that led New Zealand into the sky-high inflation, exploding debt and economic vandalism Labour imposed on Kiwis last time".

"Targeting revenue at 33% of GDP means that by 2031, Labour would need to be collecting an additional $10.3 billion in revenue every year - far more than the $1.35 billion they say their capital gains tax will raise in that same year," Willis said.

"The proposal to water down the Reserve Bank’s inflation target risks faster rising prices for every Kiwi."

Here are Labour's key pledges;

Balance the books and return to surplus. Return to original measure of OBEGAL, achieve surplus by 2029/30 and maintain a sustainable fiscal position over the forecast period.  

Bring down debt. We will aim to reduce net debt down to 20% of GDP over time and prioritise investments which support a strong growing economy.   

Keep government spending and revenue sustainable. Core Crown Expenditure and revenue will be maintained at around 33% of GDP when the Capital Gains Tax is fully implemented. 

 Strengthen scrutiny of Government spending by establishing an independent Parliamentary Budget Office to analyse Government finances and election commitments.  

Restore the Reserve Bank dual mandate to consider price stability and maximum sustainable employment. 

Restore wellbeing reporting to ensure our decisions take into account the impact on New Zealanders. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

15 Comments

Why not add another weeks leave and triple employers kiwisaver contributions as well. Another inflation s#$storm just lIke their last time in control.

Up
2

How??

Any details?

Up
0

The only study I know of which has looked at the evidence for and against single mandates found, having studied data from 176 countries over the period from 1985 to 2023, that a dual mandate raises inflation by some eight percentage points relative to inflation-only mandates. The study also found no systematic long-term employment benefits.

What the study did not address is why major economies such as the US, China, Canada and Australia have dual, or in China's case, multiple mandates.

https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/125925/

Up
2

"What the study did not address is why major economies such as the US, China, Canada and Australia have dual, or in China's case, multiple mandates."

Political acceptance - virtue signaling compromises that extend the pain instead of ripping the bandaid off. Also to enable convenient excuses in the event of failure to achieve a particular target    

Up
0

We have a dual mandate, it's just an unofficial one. If the RBNZ was oonly wworried about iinflation, our OCR wpuld be mmuch hhigher. 

By the wmay ive given up trying to fix the mistskes this new eeditor iintroduces constantly. Need to test this on a samsung phone interest team. Nice to ser the old editor go tgoigh as it was a dog. 

Up
0

Nice to hear im not the oonly one jhaving iissues. Ffrustrating 

My kdying of spelling was correc unti I hit the space bar 

Up
0

Pretty ggood sstudy going on right now. Our central bank has been more conservativ than others due to the single mandate, and our unemploymen rate is high and economy is knackered.

 

Up
0

Govt could return to an operating balance surplus in 2030 if they start a significant capital investment programme in 2027. Borrowing for capital investment is not included in the operating balance but the investment would drive a decent increase in tax revenue (thus bringing revenue up to expenditure). Are Labour brave enough to go big on capital and really set about repairing our broken infrastructure?   

Net debt at 20% of GDP is a full 1.8 percentage points below the current levels! A chunky capital investment programme would take net debt up closer to 30% before coming back down again. I suspect (hope) that this is what Labour are aiming to do. Worth remembering that even Labour's preferred net debt measure ignores a load of other financial assets. Add those in and the Govt has a net positive financial worth.

The wellbeing and RBNZ mandate proposals are performative. 

Up
0

Invest in what would be my question. All the big high BCR land transport projects are done for the time being, now it's just dregs. Energy investment is being (successfully) funded privately. 3 waters infra is mature, if run down. It doesn't really unlock anything new at this point like it did historically.

Health? I guess if you targeted it towards electives and healthcare for workers and the young it would pencil.

There is plenty of unpopular stuff which would pencil of course. But the barrier isn't money anyway.

Up
1

Public ttransport. Japan is no fLuke. 

Let's see what the CRL does for AAuckland's economy. 

This new eeditor has given me tourettes 

Up
0

To echo a couple of comments above: is there any detail on how? 

When did not releasing policy details and mechanisms become an acceptable thing?

And wellbeing: what measure won't become a political instrument?

Up
0

The legacy of covid relief measures has a long barbed tail.

No political party is going be able to turn the economy on a dime to be in surplus without a mix of increasing tax take, and exercising spending restraint.

Privately held debt in NZ stands at $117,000 per capita - for every man woman and child. Crown debt stands at $40,000 per capita.

By international standards, crown debt is relatively low, and private/commercial debt quite high. And we run a balance of payments deficit - living beyond our means.

All the talk of cost of living crisis is misleading in my opinion. Fed by expectations of a certain standard of living that fails to account for the means to support it. I am not suggesting it does not exist. But lacking is the capacity to cut one's coat to suit the cloth. That was a painful lesson to learn in the 1930s depression. And it looks to me we will have to relearn it in the 21st ccentury.

Up
0

Do you know what proportion of private debt is held by overseas institutions?

That one scares me a little.

Up
0

A big pproblem is that the people that are ffeeling the cost of living the most can't afford to travel and see that NZ has actuall done quite well. We used to go overseas and think it's cheap, definitely not the case now (depending where you go i guess)  

Not that it helps, but its certainly not a NZ problem. I guess the differenc is that other countries may have got pay rises the last few years where we opted to jam the brakes on.  

 

 

Up
0

Is this Labour heavy or National light? It seems so but then you get all the other BS from Labour.

Up
0