sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

ACT wants to freeze the minimum wage, create training wage set at 60% for youth workers, arguing 'higher wages require businesses that can grow'

Business / news
ACT wants to freeze the minimum wage, create training wage set at 60% for youth workers, arguing 'higher wages require businesses that can grow'
[updated]
ACT Party leader David Seymour and ACT small business spokesperson Laura McClure speak to media.
ACT Party leader David Seymour and ACT small business spokesperson Laura McClure speak to media. Image source: Mandy Te

ACT wants to freeze the minimum wage for three years, create a training wage set at 60% of the adult minimum wage for all workers under 20, shorten time limits for personal grievances and end the compulsory employer collection of union membership fees.

ACT small business spokesperson Laura McClure said the party was “committed to going further to cut costs placed upon businesses, and make it easier to comply with our regulatory settings."

"Laws designed to improve pay and conditions haven't done the job. Truly higher wages require businesses that can grow,” she said. “ACT's policies will grow productivity so people can genuinely take home more at the end of the week.”

  • ACT's promise included a three year freeze on minimum wage increases, saying it had “outpaced productivity.”
  • Set the training wage - which would be for workers under 20 for the first year of working for an employer - at 60% of the minimum wage. 
  • Allow protected employment exit negotiations “without triggering a personal grievance simply by starting the conversation.” 
  • Decrease the time limit for personal grievances, with a requirement for personal grievance proceedings to be lodged within three months of it being raised.
  • End compulsory employer collection of union membership fees. 
  • Recognise modern digital investment as depreciable property the same as physical investment.

The current minimum wage is $23.95 an hour, with the starting out and training minimum wages at $19.16 an hour. 

The starting out minimum age is for certain young employees under 20, and the training wage applies to worker over 20, usually for the likes of apprentices, both set at 80% of the minimum wage. 

The latest Statistics NZ labour market figures show the underutilisation rate for 15 to 24-year-olds rose to 37% from 34% in the 12 months to June, with the number of underutilised people in this age group rising 21,600 annually to 180,200. 

The largest increase in underutilisation for this group came from unemployment, up 12,200. The underutilisation rate measures the untapped capacity in the labour market.

ACT leader talks minimum wage and NEETs

Asked if ACT could guarantee that this policy would reduce the number of young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEETs), party leader David Seymour told reporters at Wellington's Tākina convention centre: "There is no question. If you create another opportunity for people who are not in employment, education and training to work, more people will work."

"How many people will take advantage of this policy to employ more young people and give them a chance? That is impossible to know, but it will be better than we are now," Seymour said. 

Asked how confident ACT was about its policy (which it also proposed in 2023) getting through in any potential future coalition agreement, Seymour said they had been consistent. 

"The ACT Party can be accused of many things but we've never been accused of inconsistency."

If people looked at what ACT's Brooke van Velden, as Minister Workplace Relations and Safety, had delivered, there had been much smaller increases in the minimum wage than the previous government, he said.

"So we have done a really good job of containing those increases to be fair to business. I believe that we can go further and so we put out this policy again. Last time it got us minimal increases, this time I suspect it might get us zero increases."

On the cost of living crisis and people on minimum wage, Seymour said: "There's no question that we have a challenge with the cost of living but people on minimum wage are not the people you think they are." 

"They're not people who are head of household, and the very few who are - less than 10% - those people are getting tax credits to help them with the cost of living crisis."

"If I wanted to help the most hard-up New Zealanders, based on the numbers, the last thing I would do is increase the minimum wage. It puts cost right through business, but it doesn't actually direct the help to the people who have the most problems with the cost of living crisis," he said.

Asked what he would say to people who were hoping to get a bump in their minimum wage, Seymour said you can't pass a law to become wealthy.

"You can only invest and innovate. The law is there to create the opportunity to have a go. But higher wages can't come from the Government just legislating up ... We tried legislating up wages under the Labour government. All we got was inflation."

Additional reporting by Mandy Te

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

24 Comments

So they desire to reduce the pay (and spending capacity) of the lowest paid in the economy....not greedy at all.

Up
10

Archaic. Cruel. Thoughtless. 

Up
9

Seymour talks sense on many topics. This is not one of them.

Blotted their copybook here for sure

Up
7

What the hell? These are people who preach free market economics and no interference anywhere so they will instead put a cap on our most vulnerable being able to survive the failings of successive government's ability to manage costs. 

Does he go home and practice smug grins in the mirror?

If that ever got implemented I would buy my own kid's ticket to Australia.

Up
10

To be fair free market would abolish minimum wage and let the market decide how much a person's labour was worth. If that was less than the current minimum wage then so be it. Those people see minimum wage as an "interference".

Up
2

It is an interference that discriminates against the unskilled. Kindness crap that ends up as a lifetime on welfare. Why should the government get involved in wage negotiations? If I want to work for nothing to learn some marketable skills/experience what business is it of the government?

Average future years on a benefit is 22 years for under 25's. Interfering in their ability to work and gain skills with fanciful minimum wages, coupled with welfare higher than market wages, is the last thing we should be doing. Killing people with kindness and trapping them in the welfare state.

 https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/research/benefit-system/benefit-system-report-2025.pdf

 

Up
1

Good point...we need a level playing field....all accumulated wealth should be forfeited to the state on death and let 'the market' determine outcomes...if you wish to exploit someone at least make sure its a family member....and plenty will.

Up
2

Why are you bringing the state or death in to it? What exploitation? It is just a private wage negotiation between two parties.   

Up
0

Ah, I see. No problem, we dont need the state or regulations we'll just negotiate between independent parties and may the apex predator prevail.

A few queries....what do you think we may achieve, how many do you imagine we could support and how long do you think we may last?

Try as I might I cant see Seymour  performing in a cage fight.

Up
2

It’s interesting that the elite outlawed violence. It could have been a great leveller. 

Up
0

Very astute, LMBF - harsh but astute. 

 

Up
0

Obviously ACT want a lower min wage, they probably always have. But why tell people that before an election?

Up
1

Why? The smugness and absolute certainty about their ideological mantra? When so convinced about the message, you believe everyone naturally agrees. 

Up
5

Act's target audience is gagging for such policies. 

Up
8

Red meat for the base 

Up
1

Yup!!!!!!

Up
0

Their target voter hires people at the poverty line. 

Up
8

To signal a place for some of those votes looking for a home....majority not sought, simply leverage.

Up
4

Policies Muldoon & Marx would be proud of.

WTF are they thinking? How are a wage freeze & youth rates ever on a liberal / market party's agenda?

I remember wage freezes & youth rates. I also remember job title & job & employer changes to keep up with 1970s & 80s CoL inflation & doing a better & faster job as a teenager than the old f***s who'd been there for years.

Just no.

Up
4

I think you've got it mixed up, the legal minimum would freeze. 

Employers would be free to pay youth and any other employee as much as they like.

Up
2

And he will of course insist on cutting MP benefits, freezing pay, cutting their numbers. Yea right.

Up
6

He probably would support those initiatives actually. Corporatist libertarians believe we should be ruled by CEOs, not democratically elected peers. 

Up
0

The spirit of Robert Muldoon lives on. 

Up
2

LOL - "you can't pass a law to be wealthy" ?????

How hilarious - I think he is so, so out-of-touch if he thinks raising the minimum wage would make anyone on it wealthy - LOL.  

But he could choose to freeze politicians wages - Labour did it during COVID.  Given the energy crisis we are facing - I see it as a bigger threat than COVID.  COVID we had some control over - high costs at the pump - we have none.

Up
1