Each week more than 100,000 readers join you at interest.co.nz for our reporting, expert analysis, thoughtful commentary, podcasts and videos, content that connects our readers to our economy and the world we live in.
A key part of this work is made possible by reader support.
Yes, we still take advertising, but direct reader support is vital to what we do. Which is why we are appealing again for your support (if you are not already doing so).
Less than one in 20 readers financially support us. We need this to be higher so we can hold on to the independent ethic we have built.
Our content is free for all readers and we want to keep it that way. We don't use paywalls or hide our content behind expensive email subscriptions. For readers who don't support us, the cost of doing so is the ads you see.
But there is a way to way to read us ad-free, one available to supporters.
We have a growing team and a growing number of research projects, none of which are being done for commercial purposes, and all of which are about informing our audience about the New Zealand economy and key financial developments.
And that is why we need your support.
We work for you, so being supported by you makes sense to me.
You know us - what we do and the resources we make available to everyone. None of this is inexpensive. But we are keen to keep almost everything free.
We know most readers appreciate the open access, but only a tiny fraction financially support us. That is where you come in.
We are asking you to join our band of readers who know this is worthwhile: holding banks, insurers, the real estate industry, politicians and regulators to account with coverage that isn't constrained by 'sponsorships' or large advertisers, nor funded by government journalism subsidies.
If you join us as a supporter and do so for at least $10/month or $100/year (or more) you get:
- 100% ad-free website browsing
- Satisfaction you are supporting an independent, home-grown professional and passionate news team.
In the future there will be more specialist tools to empower investors, savers, and anyone with financial interests.
Keen? Here’s what to do
Just click the ‘Become a supporter’ button at the top of the page to start your support of $10 a month or $100 a year, and you’ll get the best, ad-free interest.co.nz reading experience. Or click here. You can also specify the amount, or choose the one-time option if you prefer.
Finally, thank you for your readership. Can you go one better and become a supporter?
84 Comments
I get that this is an issue, but I think you're overstating it a bit. The comments are probably meant to be secondary to the articles which cost actual money to produce. I've been reading for a while and you've been a pretty active contributor in the comments for the time I've been reading. For the amount of time you spend on interest.co.nz do you not think it would be fair to maybe chuck them $10?
I see that scientists have created mice with two fathers after making eggs from male cells.
All the efforts at women's equality have been in vain, and pretty soon women won't be needed at all. And I always thought it would be the other way around; women being born with the anatomy to have children and all.
I heard a story on RNZ one night about that ... but , they hypothesised that they should be able to do the same thing for two women , extracting DNA from each of them , to ultimately produce a child which genuinely is their's ...
... which is fantastic news for same sex couples ...
Very relevant actually. For example: If you are going to select a board based on meeting quotas then you are not selecting the best board to provide shareholders with value. I believe one of the banks that collapsed in the us was very “diverse” but short of skills and experience. Also don’t underplay the political risk nz has at the moment. As long as it’s not abusive or derogatory it’s relevant.
I'm pretty sure there is evidence that a reasonable gender balance improves a board's performance, on average, so there is some evidence that diversity can improve their function. I haven't looked into whether the various other flavours of diversity have been studied in the same way.
An old joke in the New Yorker, the Chairman of the board, surrounded by balding aged portly male members, says to the only exception, young Miss Jenkins “that’s a great concept and a great proposal, now could we just wait for one of the other board members to submit it”
Are you referring to GBH. Actually I find he is one of the better contributors with his pertinent on-point wit. Like anyone, can get carried away. As the saying goes, dont sweat the small stuff
And as for housemouse, he will donate $10 one-off, for the ultimate power ... to veto those he doesn't like. I personally find his comment, having a go at the editors, troll like. So he could start by removing himself.
Sometimes banning is the answer, if what they are posting is genuinely offensive. Most of the rest of the 'trolls' are just single-issue bores who can safely ignored and scrolled by, or small time feuds that would disappear if either participant stopped replying.
Personally I think the cost of couple of coffees a month is cheap what we get here. I turned my donations up to $20 a month at the last drive, and still think this is a great deal. Imagine a world with no Interest where you have to rely on Stuff or the NZ Herald's reporting on the latest HPI stats, or current account deficit.
No problem with much of the comment except for the political partisans that band together, often one using several monikers, and cross over one another’s comments, head nodding and up ticking. A whole little coven of them from the left sprung up on here, all registered within hours of each other, in the lead up to the 2020 election.
I have noticed that too, also in relation to land tax, capital gains and lots of other leftie politics. Happened with a certain politician as well. I think that probably reflects the increase in social media people in the government. All part of the marketing strategy using peer reviews to introduce, support party lines.
If you're not going to put your money where your mouth is, who cares what you have to say?
A bigger improvement (that would possibly help with adding subs), would be to indicate some way that people were subscribers.
Anyone commenting regularly and not subscribing would fit my definition of a troll, which makes your post ironic.
Yes I have suggested that before, the reason being that it may increase subscriber income - bit like twitters blue tick or whatever they are up to.
NZ needs a subscriber supported media outlet, having int.co relying on industry shifts the influence away from where it needs to be.
That’s a very good suggestion, cif. Seperate the wheat from the chaff. And yes it will help drive up subscriptions and that’s an issue obviously in need of a boost. Just trying to think of some sort of symbol to identify subscribers. How about a pen rampant over a bible.
HouseMouse, just because someone has a go at you, or doesn't agree with you, doesn't necessarily make them a troll. I think I know who you're talking about and in my opinion your as bad as they are. You obviously read a lot of articles on here and comment more than most. Nothing's perfect, give a little, instead of just taking and complaining and trying to justify. Or are you the sort of person who will always find a reason not to pay.
Housemouse why don't you just get paid to comment? If you need any tips just ask PDK or agnostium as they know all about it. Evidently big oil, big nuclear, farming, big small government, big self reliance are falling over themselves to pay commenters on interest.co.nz. I'm not sure what the business model is but I get told about it endlessly in the comment stream so it must be true.
I pay $10 a month and it is worth every dollar. I notice people who use to pay for magazines and newspapers without any problem, are reluctant to give a much smaller amount to support good online news sites. It makes no sense to me why because it is on the internet you think it should be free, when you know it costs money to produce. I hope some of you will change your mind and agree to pay $10 a month for Interest.co.nz.
I'm happy to support as the amount of financial literacy I've gained from reading articles (and often comments) more than justifies a relatively small commitment...
Agree with HM that there's a fair degree of trolling sniping between accounts now and then, but on the whole - the different views and contrarian debate is generally a healthy mix of amusing, insightful, eye-opening, informative etc
Well GBH I expect means elsewhere. For example, subscribers to NZH paid articles are treated to rolling adverts that spring up in the columns such as Ms Street waxing lyrical about anything that will either increase her fame or revenue. It’s bloody annoying, when you are trying to read what is offered as being serious journalism, to have that interrupting and coming at you all the time.
Have you tried putting some articles behind a paywall, sans the first paragraph or two?
I pay for WSJ, Tony Alexander and NZH. Last year I paid for NBR but let it lapse this year. I don't yet pay for this site because the content skews anti-property too much to be considered an impartial news website. I concluded that I'm probably not the target audience and check in a lot less now, mainly on inflation and consents news.
I value interest.co.nz because they present the full spectrum of leading indicators and the full system view, and you can ask questions and get a wide array of responses, then check the hypotheses Vs what pans out.
With TA you get one cleverly packaged sandwich that is always the same fillings with different bread and has been going mouldy much more quickly of late
Just did the yearly support thing. Happy to do so for the Truly Independant Interest articles!!
- Nothing like the totally slanted OneWoof articles, that leads people off the financial cliff over the last few years......
Thanks to the Interest Team for the great work you guys and girls do!!!
Its great to have discussions with like and unlike minded people here, Its good to test your ideas and your swords steel against the opposite view.
Freedom of ideas and speech is important, we all gain a lot from it!
Thank you Interest.co.nz!
The writer simply asks for support and the comments section just went bananas like a bunch of school kids .
If most of you are here to vent your own agenda, then this is not what interest.co.nz main aim, go vent somewhere else, maybe a Facebook group where you can vent away with crazies all day. I would have thought this bunch has certainly higher IQ but it seems outrage is now a currency of the internet.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.